Jackie Brown (1997)

Basic plot: A middle-aged flight attendant gets caught carrying money between Mexico and the US for an American gun-trader.

Quentin Tarantino is by far one of my favorite writer-directors, if not my #1 favorite. Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Kill Bill are all among my Top 50 favorite movies of all time, and even Death Proof can probably squeeze its way into my Top 200 based solely on the last half hour.

Keeping a perfect record is tough. Not to say Jackie Brown is even remotely bad, but to me it’s by far the weakest link in Tarantino’s career.

It still has great performances, superb dialogue, and a few brilliant scenes, but among other things, I thought the pacing was a little off. The overall plot is good, and would’ve been outstanding if Tarantino could’ve tightened it up to a two hour movie, but considering there’s no more meat to the story than Reservoir Dogs had, it doesn’t really have any right being nearly an hour longer.

The characters are pretty good still, particularly Robert De Niro just because it’s such a weird character to see him as, but he’s only in the movie like 10% of the time. Samuel L. Jackson is pretty badass, Pam Grier works well as the title character,  and the Bail Bonds guy is really likeable. Still, I wouldn’t say most of them stack up against 90% of Tarantino’s other characters from his superior movies. Michael Keaton felt completely and utterly wasted. Whose idea was it for Batman to play Generic Cop #2? Generic Cop #1 is barely noticeable at all.

All in all, it’s still a good movie compared to a loooooot of movies. Compared to Tarantino’s other movies, it’s not quite on par. I’d buy it for the sake of having it and I’d rewatch it if someone else wanted to, but if I’m in a Tarantino mood there are at least four other movies I’d watch first.

I liked it.